Search & explore

• Level L05
• T15
• 21 min read

Turn a group's AI setup into something that survives an audit, a reviewer and your departure: a register of every AI use with the data-protection and AI Act questions answered by the right office, an archive of prompts, models and versions next to the data, a retention plan, and a successor who has run it.

Matching textT15-L05 · AI in research · Level 5 Operator · 20-minute read, plus 150 minutes of doing Keep Your Group's AI Use Compliant and Running After You Leave Three months' notice You've accepted a position…

• Level L04
• T15
• 20 min read

Give your research group one AI setup instead of nine private ones: an agreed assistant on known terms, a map of the group's data and who can see it, three paste rules, a shared AI-use log that feeds methods sections, and an onboarding hour for the next PhD student. Reviewed and signed by the PI.

Matching textT15-L04 · AI in research · Level 4 Integrator · 19-minute read, plus 120 minutes of doing Set Up AI for a Whole Research Group Nine people, nine private setups The group meeting runs long because…

• Level L03
• T15
• 18 min read

Before an AI step touches participant data, map where the data goes, compare it with what was approved, and ask the people who decide. Then build the step to fit the answer: minimised input, a local model, a test on hand-coded items, a README, and a colleague who can rerun it and knows when to stop.

Matching textT15-L03 · AI in research · Level 3 Builder · 17-minute read, plus 4 hours of doing, and the wait for review Get an AI Step on Participant Data Reviewed, Then Build It Inside the Approval The…

• youtube

Test prompt stability and replication instead of assuming identical reruns. Social-science lecture, not Console/LM Studio or checksum walkthrough.

Matching textT15-L02: Learn why prompts, model versions, settings and repeated execution can change research labels, and how stability and annotation agreement can be assessed. This social-science lecture…

• youtube

Identify specialist questions in risk-based AI governance and data policy. Historical orientation only, not current legal advice; use current official texts and institutional legal office.

Matching textT15-L05: Watch 5:00–26:06 for an official introduction to the EU AI Act's legislative landscape. Recorded in July 2025, it provides historical orientation, not current legal advice or a research…

• youtube

Write a structured AI-use disclosure instead of an ambiguous statement. Independent educator, not publisher authority. Check destination journal policy; template compliance/human-check element unverified.

Matching textT15-L01: Watch the three-tier templates at 2:45 and fill-in framework at 5:45 for help drafting a specific AI-use disclosure. This January 2026 educator tutorial is not publisher authority. Check…