Web servicesBase44

Decision matrix

Base44 app decision matrix
Overview

Verdict: a fast way to get a working app with logins, a database and hosting, without a developer. Owned by Wix since mid-2025, which makes it a safer long-term bet than most one-person app builders. Stay on the free plan for a prototype; you only need Starter once you want your own domain.

Other good fits
  • Someone testing a club, course or small-business idea before paying a developer to build it properly.
Pros
Read pros

Base44 builds a full web app from a written description: a design, a database, user sign-up and hosting, all generated and hosted by the service. You keep changing it by asking for edits in plain English, or with your own code changes once you outgrow the prompt. Wix bought Base44 in mid-2025, so it now sits inside a company with the money to keep a hosted product running.

Pick it when…

  • You want a working prototype (a form, a signup list, a small dashboard) without writing or hosting anything yourself.
  • You're testing whether an idea is worth a developer's time before you commit a budget.
  • You're comfortable staying inside Base44's hosting and database, at least until the idea proves itself.
Cons
Read cons

A preview that looks right is not proof that sign-up, permissions or a connected integration behave correctly; test each one as the user who shouldn't have access, not just as yourself. Base44 hosts the app, the database and the users, so you're relying on its uptime and its access controls, not your own.

Pick something else when…

  • You want to see and edit the underlying code from day one. Bolt.new shows the code as it builds and syncs to GitHub without an upgrade.
  • You want a similar prompt-to-app flow with a different design style or pricing. Lovable is the closest direct alternative.
  • You'd rather build inside a full IDE with your own deployment target. A traditional editor plus a coding agent gives you that control, at the cost of doing the hosting yourself.

Avoid if

  • You're building something that must hold sensitive personal data; a hosted, prompt-built app needs its access rules checked, not assumed.
Workflow

Describe the outcome you want in one prompt, or start from a URL or a Figma file → review the generated preview → ask for one change at a time in chat → open the Data tab and check who can see and edit what → try the app as the kind of user who shouldn't have access → publish only once that check passes.

Cost
Read cost

Prices checked 23 September 2026 (pricing (opens in a new tab), annual billing shown; monthly costs more):

PlanPriceMessage credits/monthApps
Free$025Up to 5
Starter$16/month100Unlimited
Builder$40/month250Unlimited, adds code export and GitHub
Pro$80/month500Unlimited, adds premium support
Elite$160/month1,200Unlimited, adds dedicated support

Each prompt or edit spends message credits, so a chatty back-and-forth with the AI burns through a plan faster than a few well-planned prompts. Code export to GitHub needs Builder or higher. There's nothing to install; the ongoing work is checking access rules and data settings each time you change something.

Restrictions

An account is required to save work. Code export to your own repository needs the Builder plan or above; on Free and Starter, the app and its data stay inside Base44. Check the Data tab's export and access settings before you collect anything you'd need to move or delete later.

First project

Documentation-based suggestion — not run here.

Build a fictional club-event signup page: a public form for members and a private results view for organisers only.

  1. Prompt for the two pages and the organiser-only view.
  2. Fill in five made-up signups, no real names.
  3. Log in as a normal member and confirm you can't reach the organiser view.
  4. Open the Data tab and check what's collected and who can export it.

Done when the role boundary actually holds (a member account can't see the organiser page) and you've listed what you'd need to check before using this with real names.

Links & evidence
Documentation-based · not hands-on · Sep 23, 2026

Rests on Base44's pricing page, its quick-start and data-management documentation, and public reporting on the Wix acquisition, all read on 2026-09-23. No Base44 account or app was created for this review.

  • Base44 pricing · Sep 23, 2026 — Free/Starter/Builder/Pro/Elite plans, message and integration credits, app limits.
  • Base44 quick-start guide · Sep 23, 2026 — Prompt-to-app workflow, preview, testing as a user, publishing steps, sign-up requirement.
  • Base44 data management · Sep 23, 2026 — Data export path and the Data tab used to review access and collected data.
  • Wix acquires Base44 · Sep 23, 2026 — Confirms Wix bought Base44 in 2025 for roughly $80 million.
  • Bolt.new GitHub sync · Sep 23, 2026 — Comparison alternative with code view and GitHub sync included by default.
Further review notes & alternatives

Alternatives and trade-offs

  • Bolt.new wins when you want to see the generated code and push it to GitHub without waiting for a paid tier.
  • Lovable wins as a close alternative with its own design conventions; worth comparing on the same prompt.
  • A developer with a traditional stack wins once the app needs guarantees Base44 doesn't publish, like a specific hosting region or a full audit trail.

Learn more

Catalogue facts

Build and deploy applications from prompts with storage and authentication included. Choose it when a managed platform should handle core application services. Its hosted model makes export and migration checks important decisions.

Base44 · free-tier · cloud

  • no-code builder
  • full-stack generation
  • user authentication
  • built-in database
  • custom domain hosting
  • integration connectors
  • workflow automation
  • build-app
  • automate
View sourced image

Base44

Press Escape to close.

Official Base44 quick-start interface screenshot showing its example CRM project.

Base44 official product documentation

Owner-requested editorial use of public official interface screenshots, 15 September 2026. Copyright retained by the original publisher; attribution preserved. No open licence or hands-on course execution is asserted. Source asset: https://mintcdn.com/base44/8tvlbqCF8z7QWtN5/images/2025-11-09_16-02-34.png. PNG conversion preserves the complete frame. Converted on 15 October 2026 to a 1600px-wide WebP (quality 80) for faster page loads; the original image remains in the media library.

Original image source (opens in a new tab)

Browse all tools