Your First Automation: Build It, Break It, Switch It Off | Heidelberg AI Curriculum
T05-L01
Your First Automation: Build It, Break It, Switch It Off
Build one n8n workflow that turns a form entry into a logged row with a timestamp. Test it before you switch it on, break it once on purpose so you know what failure looks like, and find the off switch before you need it.
Every Monday you copy the same details from one place to another. In the lab it is the freezer log: during the week you scribble box IDs, freezer positions and contents on a glove box or in your notebook, and on Monday you type them into your own log sheet. By then one note is missing, and you spend ten minutes opening freezer doors to find box 14.
In a company it is the call log. You take a dozen customer calls a week and note them on paper. On Friday you type customer, topic and "needs a follow-up?" into a spreadsheet. Half the time you can no longer tell whether a call needed a follow-up.
The copying is dull, and it happens too late. An automation fixes both: you enter the details once, at the moment they happen, and a workflow writes them into your log with the time attached. This book builds that workflow with n8n, running on your own computer. You are at Level 1 User: the log is yours, so if the workflow breaks, only you are affected. That makes this a good place to break it on purpose.
After this you can
Take one repeated copy-and-paste job through the four quadrants to a working trigger and action.
Build a form-to-table workflow in n8n and test it before switching it on.
Read the run history and tell a successful run from a failed one, even when the form said thank you.
Publish the workflow, then Unpublish it, and say where it runs while it's on.
Heidelberg AI Desk installed on your computer. It installs and starts n8n for you. On Windows, Desk's installer also sets up Podman, the program that runs the apps. For a Mac or Linux, the quick start is at ai.32dots.de/help.
One repeated copying job from your own week, with three or four details you copy each time.
About an hour: 12 minutes to read, 45 to do.
Last verified 12 October 2026, against the help pages of Heidelberg AI Desk 0.2.0-alpha.8, which installs n8n 2.40.7. The n8n steps were last checked on 27 September 2026, in the same n8n version under the earlier Desk. Details for experts at the end of this book.
The idea in one page
An automation has two parts. A trigger decides when it starts: a form is submitted, a file appears, it's Monday at 8:00. An action does the work: add a row, send a message, save a file.
In n8n each part is a node, a box on the screen. A workflow is a set of nodes joined by lines on the editor page.
Each form you build has two web links. The Test URL works only while you are testing; the Production URL works once the workflow is published.
Every time the trigger fires, n8n makes one execution, one run through the workflow. The Executions tab lists them with a status: Succeeded or Error, in red when something failed. That list is your run history. It is the only honest answer to "did it work?"
A workflow has two modes, and mixing them up causes most beginner trouble:
Testing
Switched on
How it starts
You open the trigger and pull in a test submission
The trigger fires by itself
Which form link
Test URL
Production URL
Needs
Nothing
Publish
Where you see the data
Right in the editor
In the Executions tab
Three facts change how you work:
It runs on your own computer. Once published, the workflow keeps working as long as your computer is on and n8n is running, even after you close Desk's window. That's different from a service running somewhere else, and it's why you need to know how to stop it.
The trigger's reply tells you nothing about the rest. A form set to answer as soon as it is submitted says thank you before the workflow has done anything. If a later node fails, the person filling in the form never knows.
The off switch is Unpublish. Find it before you publish, not while something is misfiring.
Which tool? This book uses n8n, installed and started through Heidelberg AI Desk: a visual editor, strong enough to grow with you, running on your own computer from the first click. Make is a visual middle ground with many ready-made connectors, the links to other apps. Zapier connects the most apps with the least setup, but offers less control. All three teach the same ideas; what you learn here carries over.
Watch it once (30 seconds)
No sound. A yellow dot points at each button while the caption explains it. The first seconds show the earlier Desk; yours looks different, and n8n is the same version. Read the tour as text (opens in a new tab).
Set up (steps 1 to 3, once)
Step 1: Open Heidelberg AI Desk and find n8n. Open Heidelberg AI Desk from the Start menu, or with a click on its icon next to the clock, and click App Store.
You should see: a card for n8n. On the left, the window says Local apps can run; if it doesn't, click Set up Podman first.
Step 2: Click Install and open. On n8n's card, click Install and open. The first time, Desk downloads the app, about 1.2 GB, so this takes a few minutes.
You should see: n8n open in your browser, at the address http://127.0.0.1:35678/.
Step 3: Set up your account. n8n asks you to set up the owner account: an email address, your name and a password of at least 8 characters with a number and a capital letter. n8n sends nothing to the address. Write the password down: on your own computer, n8n can't mail you a new one.
n8n may then make two offers. You need neither: click Skip on the licence key, and Set up later in Settings on the assistant.
You should see: after you finish, n8n's Overview page, ready for your first workflow.
Structure it."Every Monday I spend 20 minutes typing last week's freezer notes into my log, and about one box a month goes missing from it. A good result: each box is logged the moment it goes in, with the time, and nothing is lost."
Understand it. She looks at a month of notes. The typing is dull, but the real damage comes from the delay: notes written on gloves and scraps don't survive until Monday. She also notices she always writes the same three things: box ID, position ("-80 B, shelf 3") and contents. She never writes the date, and she has needed it twice. Back to Structure it: "Log box ID, position and contents on the lab computer next to the freezer, and stamp the time automatically."
Choose tools. Going down the ladder: typing straight into a spreadsheet works, but nothing stops her from skipping a field, and the time is never filled in. A form fixes both: it makes every field required, and the workflow adds the time. n8n's built-in data table holds the log, so she needs no spreadsheet account and no passwords. Nothing here needs AI.
Build it. Seven steps, about 35 minutes.
Step 4: Make the table. On the Overview page, click the + at the top left and choose New data table. Name it freezer_log and choose From scratch.
Click Create, then click Add Column four times to add box_id, position, contents and logged_at, each type String.
You should see: your table with those four columns, next to the id, createdAt and updatedAt columns n8n adds by itself.
Step 5: Add the trigger and the form. Create a new workflow, name it Freezer log, click the plus on the empty canvas, and choose On form submission. Work down its settings:
Authentication: choose n8n User Auth, so only someone logged in to your n8n can submit it.
Form Title:Freezer log.
Click Add Form Element three times for Box ID, Position and Contents. For each: type the label, click Add Attributes, add Custom Field Name (type box_id, position, contents to match), then add Required Field and turn it on.
You should see: three required fields, each with a matching Custom Field Name.
Step 6: Add the action. Click the plus on the form node, search Data table, and choose Insert row. Pick your table, keep Map Each Column Manually, and for box_id, position and contents, switch each to Expression and reference the matching field, for example {{ $json.box_id }}. For logged_at, use {{ $json.submittedAt }}, the time stamp the form adds to every entry.
Step 7: Test with a real entry. Open the form node and click Execute step. n8n opens the test form in a new tab; the first time, it asks you to confirm you trust this form, because it runs using your n8n login.
Click Allow access, then fill in a real box and submit. Back in the editor, the form node's Output shows every field, including submittedAt in UTC, for example 2026-09-26T15:20:44+00:00.
Step 8: Publish it. Click Publish, name the version, and click Publish again in the window that opens.
Copy the Production URL from the form node and submit one real box from the freezer. Open the Executions tab: you see a run marked Succeeded, with your data in it.
Step 9: Break it on purpose. Open Insert row again, click the box_id value, and replace it with a deliberately broken reference:
{{ $('Nonexistent Node').item.json.box_id }}
n8n's own preview under the field already warns you: Referenced node doesn't exist. Publish this version anyway, then submit a test box through the Production URL. The form thanks you exactly as before. It replies before the rest of the workflow runs, so it has no way to know anything is wrong. Open Executions: the newest run shows Error, in red, with Insert row outlined in red on the diagram and "Problem in node 'Insert row': Referenced node doesn't exist" underneath. No row was added to your table.
This is the failure you would never notice from the form. Fix it: put {{ $json.box_id }} back, publish again, and submit once more. The newest execution now shows Succeeded, with your row safely in the table.
Step 10: Find the off switch. Decide now: if you'll use the log this week, leave it published. If not, open the small arrow next to Publish and click Unpublish.
Either way, you now know where the switch is.
What it taught her: the thank-you page can lie. For a log only she uses, checking the Executions tab once a week is enough. If colleagues start using the form, she'll need a warning message when a run fails. That's the next trip round the quadrants (T05-L04 · Make an Automation Safe to Fail Before It Touches Real Systems).
Company: the call log
Structure it."I type about twelve call notes into a spreadsheet every Friday, and half of them don't say whether I promised a follow-up. A good result: each call logged within a minute of hanging up, and a follow-up flag on every one."
Understand it. He compares a month of paper notes with his inbox. The missing follow-up flags are the real cost: two customers waited a week for a callback he had promised. The typing is a minor cost. Back to Structure it: "Log customer, topic and follow-up yes/no right after the call. The follow-up answer can't be skipped."
Choose tools. The same skeleton as the lab: a form, a data table, no AI. The one change is the follow-up field: a Dropdown element with yes and no, marked required, so the question can't be left blank.
Build it. He follows the same steps (4 to 10) with a table called call_log and fields customer, topic and follow_up. What it taught him: he'd rather know within the hour when a run fails, because a lost call note means a customer waiting. His next trip round the quadrants is a failure message, and after that a Monday summary of every open follow-up (T05-L02 · Put AI in the Middle of a Workflow, and Check Every Answer).
In both cases the automation is small: one trigger, one action. The value came from Understand it: the problem was never really the typing.
What goes wrong
Switching it on before testing.Symptom: you publish, submit a real entry, and the table fills with rows that read {{ $json.box_id }} instead of a real value. Fix: always run Execute step on the trigger with a real entry first, and check every field of the result before you publish.
Testing with the wrong link.Symptom: the Test URL says the form trigger "isn't listening yet." Fix: open the trigger node and click its own Execute step; only then is it listening for that Test URL. The Production URL only works once the workflow is Published.
Forgetting where it runs.Symptom: you close the laptop and assume the automation has stopped, or you're surprised it's still going days later. Fix: a published workflow keeps running as long as your computer is on, even after you close Desk's window, and Desk starts n8n again the next time you sign in to your computer. Unpublish to stop it for real.
n8n isn't running.Symptom: the Production URL doesn't answer, or n8n won't open at all. Fix: open Heidelberg AI Desk and click Open on n8n's card (it may read Start and open). Closing Desk's window doesn't stop n8n; the Stop button on its card does.
Do it yourself (45 minutes)
Use your own repeated copying job, not the freezer or the call log.
Structure it (5 min). Write one sentence: what you copy, how often, and what a good result looks like. List the three or four details you copy every time.
Understand it (10 min). Look at the last few weeks of that job. Where does it actually go wrong: the typing, the delay, or a detail that's often missing? Rewrite your sentence if you learned something.
Choose tools (5 min). Could a spreadsheet or a template do it? If a form plus a data table is the simplest thing that solves what you found, continue. Keep personal data about other people out of your practice log (T12-L01 · Decide What You May Paste Into AI at Work).
Build it (25 min). Follow steps 4 to 10 with your own fields. Test with a real entry, publish, submit once for real, then check the Executions tab and decide whether to leave it published.
Exit check
What you hand in: a screenshot of your workflow's Executions tab showing at least one Succeeded and one Error run, plus one line: "The off switch is ___, and while it's published it runs on ___."
It passes when you can point to the row your test created in the data table, and explain in one sentence why the form saying thank you doesn't prove the row was saved.
Rule to remember
Know how to stop it before you start it.
Details for experts
Checked on 12 October 2026 for Heidelberg AI Desk, on 27 September 2026 for the n8n steps. You don't need this to follow the book; it's for setting things up or answering a colleague.
What
Details
What it means for you
n8n version
Heidelberg AI Desk 0.2.0-alpha.8 installs n8n 2.40.7.
The Publish/Unpublish flow and data tables in this book need this version or newer; older releases use an Active/Inactive switch instead, and don't have data tables.
n8n as a paid service
n8n also exists as a paid cloud service, n8n Cloud, run on n8n's own servers instead of yours. This book doesn't use it.
Worth knowing if your team later wants automations that don't depend on one person's computer.
Where the data is stored
Everything lives on your own computer, in a storage space named ai-lab-n8n-data that Podman keeps for n8n.
Nothing leaves your machine. Desk has no backup button yet: to keep a workflow, save it as a file with Download in the editor's three-dot menu.
Form field names
Each field's Custom Field Name is what the next node reads it by; without it, n8n uses the label text itself (spaces included) as the key.
Setting a short Custom Field Name (like box_id) makes expressions easier to type and read.
Quick off switch
Unpublish is in the Publish button's menu (Ctrl+U).
The fastest way to stop a workflow that misfires.
Time zone of the time stamp
The form's submittedAt time follows the time zone Heidelberg AI Desk gives n8n. A new installation uses German time; one made with a Desk before 0.2.0-alpha.8 uses UTC, the world's reference time.
If the times in your log look off by a few hours, Desk's help page (ai.32dots.de/help, under n8n) names the setting to change.
Web servicesLocal & self-hosted appsCloud · Self-hosted
Free
What you can do
Chain APIs, models, databases, and files into visual workflows.
Before choosing
Choose and secure hosting deliberately; credentials and workflow data follow that deployment path.
Watch
How to Use n8n Data Tables (Complete Tutorial)
How to Use n8n Data Tables (Complete Tutorial)Leon van Zyl
T05-L01: Follow a form-driven workflow that writes records into an n8n Data Table. The interface is older; follow the book for Heidelberg AI Desk setup, authentication and Publish/Unpublish.
The Battle for the World Brain: Whoever Builds It Rules the World | All on One Map
The Battle for the World Brain: Whoever Builds It Rules the World | All on One MapVideo · Everlast AI · Oct 20, 2026
The video analyzes the AI race between the USA, China, and Europe through the factors of electricity, chips, and data centers. It opens on the Galaxy Campus in Wulan Shaban, Inner Mongolia, built by the Chinese wind-energy company Envision and described as the world's largest single AI data center building (~120,000 m²), designed for over 2 GW powered by local renewables; it is the first project of the 'Mission Gobi' initiative, which aims for 5 GW of green AI computing by 2030. It states China added ~429 GW of new generation capacity in 2024 versus ~51 GW in the USA, and that roughly 75% of global AI computing power comes from the USA, 15% from China, and under 5% from Europe. It discusses the shift to liquid cooling, Google's plan (announced September 9, 2026) to invest at least €13 billion in Finnish data centers, the Stargate Norway project by Scale, Acer and Ormei near the Arctic Circle, and the role of German fan and motor maker EBM Papst. Elon Musk is quoted saying that energy and chips will decide the AI race.
Gemini 4 Argon & Meta 'Wonder': What Really Changes! Real Use Cases | AI-NEWS
Gemini 4 Argon & Meta 'Wonder': What Really Changes! Real Use Cases | AI-NEWSVideo · Everlast AI · Oct 18, 2026
Google and Meta have launched new AI models, Gemini 4 Argon and Meta Muse Wonder, which reportedly beat Claude Opus 5 on benchmarks. Argon is the first model to generate up to one million output tokens in a single step, and Google is using its own models to build the next generation (recursive self-improvement). Google claims Argon advances robotics—building a physical simulation from a single table photo to produce 4,500 training runs and raising a robot's real-world success rate from 56% to 75%—quantum computing—creating a quantum-algorithm building block needing 100x less hardware and compute with mathematically proven correctness, and rewriting Google's own Alpha Qubit error correction to nearly double throughput—and mentions an upcoming Gemini Nano Banana 3 Pro and the open-weights Flux 3 Image small 4K image model. In a practical test, three models each spent 16 hours building a clone of the Monday software: Muse Wonder half-fulfilled the task (functional but not Monday-like), Argon worked but imperfectly (e.g., emojis instead of icons), and Claude Opus 5's result was cut off. The video also covers Drift Voice 3.0 voice agents handling 20,000 daily phone calls at Starling with a 70% success rate, and GPT Live 1.1 improvements in German.
Matt Pocock: The Most Valuable Skill to Learn in the Age of AI
Matt Pocock: The Most Valuable Skill to Learn in the Age of AIVideo · Nate Herk · Oct 16, 2026
In a podcast interview, developer Matt Pocock—who taught himself to code and worked as a developer for roughly 18 years—explains how he now relies on AI coding agents. He says the best results come from telling agents what you care about and improving the codebase and environment they work in, because agents fill gaps with their own assumptions. He says spec-driven development made his code worse for months. He considers the release of Claude Opus 4.5 and Open Claw in December 2025 the point where he stopped writing code himself, and he runs Claude Opus 5.5 on medium effort. He argues software-engineering fundamentals—good tests, audits, and preventing error classes—matter more now, and that non-technical people can seize opportunities by using agents to identify cognitive workflows and present them to organizations. On trust, he recommends skepticism and reading primary sources rather than trusting agent output, noting that agent hallucinations have decreased but still occur.
Ex-Consul General Opens Up: 'We Slept Through EVERYTHING!' The Truth About China (Wolfgang Röhr)
Ex-Consul General Opens Up: 'We Slept Through EVERYTHING!' The Truth About China (Wolfgang Röhr)Video · Everlast AI · Oct 15, 2026
In an interview for the Everlast AI channel, Dr. Wolfgang Röhr, the former German Consul-General in Shanghai who lived and worked in China for roughly 23 years and witnessed four Chinese leadership generations, reflects on China's rise. He says China's economy has grown explosively over the decades and material living standards have improved enormously, but spiritual and cultural openness has declined since the late 1980s. He contrasts China's efficient, punctual infrastructure—such as its high-speed rail, where a full train is simply replaced by another minutes later—with Germany's apparent stagnation, citing a Chinese professor's observation that Berlin's Bahnhof Zoo still looks like an ongoing construction site. He argues the German auto industry missed China's development and that people who were in China during the COVID period could have anticipated what happened. He also recounts that a passage about the exiled writer and later Culture Minister Wang Meng was cut from a Chinese newspaper interview.
Trace one synthetic form submission through Form Trigger, Edit Fields and Convert to File into a separate CSV, then distinguish input rejection, a controlled execution failure and human handover.Open full canvas
automation-tools
Automation tools
One-page diagram to use with T05-L01, "Your First Automation: Build It, Break It, Switch It Off".Open full canvas